Month: November 2011

I’ve been doing some thinking on church membership recently.

In France, the lack of commitment of many professing christians is a problem. People make a profession of faith and take a long time to get baptised, or never get baptised at all. Others get baptised and never enter into membership in their local church. Or they will become members of the church where they are baptised, but when they move out, they never bother resigning from membership and taking membership in the church where they settle down (if they ever settle down into another church). All of these people may attend the meetings regularly, they often may take responsibilities in the church, and even attend members’ meetings (taking part in the meetings but not voting),without ever taking membership in their church.

This leads to all sorts of problems. People come and leave as soon as they are not “fulfilled”(whatever that means), or because there are no other children, or they don’t like the music… But also how do you exercise church discipline if there isn’t a clear difference between committed members, and mere attenders?

It’s complicated. But I wonder if part of the answer lies in the Roman Catholic Background. Who are the members of the Roman Catholic Church? All those baptised into the church (as infants or adults), are automatically members. The fact that they attend or not does not change that and they remain members (unless they are excommunicated, but does that happen in our days?). I suppose the thinking of Evangelical christians goes along the line: I am saved by faith in Christ, I believe, so I am saved and therefore a member of the church. But it seems to me that there is a difference between professing faith (and therefore being member of God’s invisible, universal church), and being a member of the local church. Does a mere profession of faith and regular attendance make someone a member of the local church? Somehow, I think there is a need for some visible form of membership (baptism, and being on the church rolls). It seems to me that it is the same difference between marriage and simply living together. In the first there is a public commitment and covenant. In the second, there is no clear public commitment, and each one is free to move on  when they “feel” the relationship is not suiting them anymore. Most Christians agree that marriage should be the norm, yet they do not think that beeing a church member is important. I find it puzzling. What do you think?

This week, I am going down to Rostrenen with the stand for the weekly market. It is on Tuesday morning.

I am persevering with the Breton lessons. It’s not much: 1h30 per week, but that’s better than nothing. It is also an opportunity to meet some new people. I have also bought the first volume of the Breton Oulpann, a method to learn the language. I learned Welsh through the same method, and found it very good and efficient. I use the book and the CD to do a bit of Breton everyday (20-30 min). It is proving useful.

The next challenge will be to actually meet some Breton speaking people and make myself understand.